DFL, gun control
In Minnesota the 2012 election put the DFL
Emboldened by these
results, the gun control advocates swiftly introduced new legislation
to put limits on the law abiding gun owners in our state. The four
bills now pending in the House are HF 241, HF 242, HF 243 and HF 244
and they’re all authored and sponsored by Democrats. No Republicans
have their names attached to any of them.
Meanwhile, as the DFL
wants to tell non-criminals what guns they should be allowed to own and
how many bullets the magazines should hold, they also want convictedviolent felons to be able to have guns. What? Yes, HF 486, alsoauthored by Democrats, would allow rapists and murderers to get theirguns back. Does this make any sense to you? The hypocrisy isastounding. Let’s take legally purchased firearms away from law abidinggun owners and give them to convicted violent felons. Amazing!
If you voted for Democrats in the last election, are you surprised by this?
I’mnot. Even if the DFL representative or senator in your district saysthey’re pro-gun rights, the party they belong to is not. When you putthem in the majority, this is what you get. Elections haveconsequences, and the DFL in Minnesota is just getting started. Don’texpect your governing body in St. Paul to give a fig about your 2ndAmendment rights here in the northern part of the state. They seem tocare more about criminals having guns than you.
Hopefully, in theelection two years from now, you’ll think a little more about what theparty stands for when you mark your ballot.