SUBSCRIBE NOW AND SAVE 3 months just 99 ¢/month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Reader Opinion: Talk isn't transparency

...

ReaderOpinionBlue.JPG

We have heard over the past several months a great deal of talk about transparency and based on recent actions by the school board, that is really just what it is, talk.

On Oct. 25, the board received a list of the applicants they ranked in order of priority and then made a determination of who would be the applicants they were going to interview.

When Chairman Nelson was about to announce the names of the candidates that were going to be interviewed, Superintendent Larson told her to read the names alphabetically, even though the list was not provided with the names in alphabetical order.

The document they were discussing was a public document.

They were discussing the document during a public meeting.

ADVERTISEMENT

The meeting was being videotaped.

Still, Chairman Nelson read the document in alphabetical order without even raising an eyebrow.

No questions were asked. They were given instructions by Superintendent Larson and they followed those instructions lockstep.

Again, not a single board member questioned or challenged the superintendent's instructions.

Why did Superintendent Larson do this?

It's simple, she wanted to hide, yes hide, the prioritized list of candidates from the public.

If the school board claims to be transparent, then they were required to read the document the way it was presented, not in a manner that was nothing but nontransparent.

It is Superintendent Larson’s job to inform the board when rules need to be followed, not tell the board to do something that hides the truth from the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Truth is crucial.

Truth garners support from all the people in this district and should be implemented all the time, not occasionally.

Can any one of the board members tell us of one single thing that is more important than the truth?

Nick Hillman

Brainerd

Related Topics: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
What to read next
As citizens concerned about election integrity, we have been condemned by the League of Women Voters with accusations on our effort to restore integrity to our elections, and we now have opinion letters from citizens that have no Idea what information we found and only have anger to offer as a response.
Representatives for people they have a responsibility to serve and protect.
On a national basis, we have all contributed various amounts of tax dollars to 60 court cases on the 2020 election and none found notable errors or cause to make changes.
We can’t save this planet because too many people refuse to accept the truth.