A Nov. 11 letter writer disagreed with a previous letter's claim that global warming science is invalidated by God's promise: "Never again will I destroy all life by waters of a flood" (Genesis 8:21-9:11). I also disagree, but for different reasons.
Multiple false premises invalidate the foregoing proposition. It presumes that God's promise of what he will not do precludes destruction life by other means such as fire, or through another agent such as humankind. It also falsely assumes that scientists view the most likely risk as destruction of "all life." There would be catastrophic earthquakes and weather-related destruction causing crippling global economic and social disruption. This may have enough of a limiting effect on global warming to preserve some life, albeit little of the "good" life.
Specious theological arguments obscure deeper relevant biblical meanings. Textual education in spiritual truths does not require inerrant historical accuracy. In the case of Noah, the foundational issue is why God took such drastic "starting over" action. The reason in the text is not labeled human sin. Rather, it is "The earth was corrupt and filled with violence." Some theologians consider any unnecessary human violence that has any negative effects on well-being of any of creation is the worst or closest sin to "original." Regardless of agreement on this interpretation, by adding Jesus' relevant words and actions, a reasonable conclusion is that God abhors unjustified inter-human violence, which usually begets more violence.
Increasing dubiously justified violence against both humans and the environment has marked 21st century U.S. history. Some American Christians attempt to use biblical texts to obscure or justify such actions. Many other U.S. Christians see in this trend reason for repentance, and responsibly taking corrective action. Beyond these disagreements, Christians should agree that God has a view on the matter.
Dick Peterson
ADVERTISEMENT
Nisswa
