One of the surest ways to know you have truly hit your mark when pointing out the relentless sophistry and complete phoniness of leftist propagandists is the emptiness of their too-clever-by-half attempts at securing the last word.
Such was surely the case in The Good Doctor From Nisswa's floridly pedantic offering over the weekend.
His window dressing argument boils down to this:
"I didn't see anything wrong in the opinion pieces about Representative Heintzeman. But I sure caught a eyeful in the pieces criticizing those innocent offerings."
Utterly standard progressive fare. When stripped of its rococo pizazz, it's really quite childish.
ADVERTISEMENT
Deny. Call your exposers liars, and move on. So predictable.
He concludes by wrapping himself in the "readers" (that's you, folks!), stating that they are the important judges.
Indeed they are.
You see, Doc, readers are also voters. When a multi-term incumbent, in very cozy standing with the local press, is taken out by a rookie offering honesty, family values, and a genuine personal connection to real people, it means those voters saw something in the x-rays that you, in all your worldly wisdom, simply refused to see.
That is one of those unique characteristics of humans, too. They know a full load when they see one.
(You can just list me as a semi-retired amateur pathologist.)
Guy Green
Brainerd